
November 4, 2026
Employment Law
Considering an employee’s dismissal? Understand the contract, payment, benefits and protected-rights issues that can affect an Ontario employer’s obligations.
Illustrative image; the person and workplace shown are not Legal Route staff, a client or an actual matter.
Discuss a proposed terminationCall 905-283-8514
Planning a dismissal or responding to an employee’s concern? Tell Legal Route your business’s name, the employee’s name, whether a decision has already been communicated and any approaching date. We will check conflicts and availability, explain consultation arrangements and any applicable fee, and confirm whether we can assist. An inquiry does not create a lawyer-client relationship or mean we have accepted a deadline.
Before ending an employee’s employment in Ontario, an employer needs to consider the employment agreement, minimum statutory obligations, possible additional rights and the reason and circumstances of the decision. A payment based only on length of service may leave important issues unresolved.
This guide concerns non-union employment governed by Ontario law. Federally regulated and unionized workplaces involve different rules. Fixed-term contracts, worker classification and industry exemptions may also change the assessment.
The starting point is the employee’s agreement, including later amendments, compensation plans and any relevant policies. The wording, when the documents were agreed to and whether the termination provisions meet minimum employment standards can affect their enforceability.
For indefinite employment, reasonable notice at common law may apply unless an enforceable agreement displaces it. The assessment is fact-specific; there is no universal “one month per year” formula. A fixed-term agreement raises different questions and should not simply be treated as an ordinary indefinite contract.
A probation clause also requires review. The three-month qualifying period for termination notice or pay under Ontario’s Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA) does not create a general exemption from contractual obligations, human rights or other protections.
Under the ESA, eligible employees with at least three months of continuous employment generally require written notice, termination pay instead of notice, or a compliant combination. The amount depends on the applicable rules, including any exemption or group-termination provisions.
ESA severance pay is a separate entitlement. Eligibility generally requires at least five years of employment and either an employer with a global payroll of at least $2.5 million, or a qualifying permanent closure that severs the employment of at least 50 employees within six months. Exceptions and the detailed statutory requirements matter. Five years of service alone does not establish eligibility.
Minimum ESA entitlements may not resolve the employer’s full obligations. The agreement and applicable common law can provide greater rights. A package needs an assessment of how those entitlements overlap, rather than assuming that every possible amount is simply added together.
The review may include earned wages, vacation pay, commissions, bonuses, benefits, pension contributions and other compensation. Incentive-plan wording can affect what is owed following dismissal; the label “discretionary” does not answer every question.
The ESA requires applicable benefit-plan contributions to continue through the statutory notice period, including the corresponding period when termination pay replaces notice. Vacation pay is also payable on termination pay. Any benefits or compensation exposure beyond statutory minimums requires separate review of the agreement, plans and applicable law.
Two employees receive the same base salary. One also participates in a commission plan and group benefits; the other has a fixed-term agreement. A proposal based only on salary and years worked would not address those differences. The legal work depends on the complete relationship and documents, not just a payroll calculation.
Poor performance, a policy breach or a warning does not automatically establish just cause. The nature and seriousness of the conduct, surrounding circumstances and employment record can all matter.
The ESA exemption for wilful misconduct, disobedience or wilful neglect of duty that is not trivial and has not been condoned is narrower than common-law just cause. An allegation of cause does not, by itself, remove statutory notice, termination pay or severance obligations. The evidence and applicable tests require separate assessment.
A dismissal must not be discriminatory or a prohibited reprisal. Disability and accommodation, pregnancy, family status, protected leave, workplace complaints and the exercise of employment-standard rights can be relevant. A genuine business reason does not end the inquiry if a protected ground also influenced the decision.
An employee being on leave does not make every unrelated termination unlawful. However, the actual reasons, timing, selection criteria and applicable leave or accommodation duties need careful review. Paying notice or obtaining a signature does not automatically resolve those concerns.
A release may form part of a negotiated settlement of claims. Its effect depends on the wording, consideration and circumstances in which it was agreed to. A signature alone does not guarantee that every claim is settled.
Minimum ESA payments already owed must not be made conditional on signing a release. Any additional settlement offer needs to be distinguished from those obligations. Employees should have a reasonable opportunity to consider the terms and obtain independent advice; there is no single review period that fits every situation. An offer deadline does not postpone statutory payment obligations.
Group changes require a wider assessment. Ontario’s mass-termination rules generally concern 50 or more employees at an establishment within four weeks, subject to exceptions. The analysis can include employees who work exclusively from home. Group notice and information requirements, and job-seeking leave for eligible employees, may apply.
A temporary layoff also raises separate statutory and contractual questions. Meeting an ESA layoff category does not automatically establish a contractual right to lay someone off. A significant unilateral change to pay, duties or other fundamental terms can raise constructive-dismissal issues even where no termination letter has been issued.
You do not need to send the complete personnel file to make an inquiry. Ask about secure intake arrangements before sharing confidential employment records, medical information or third-party documents.
Legal Route provides employment-law services through a lawyer licensed by the Law Society of Ontario. Subject to conflicts, availability and an agreed retainer, we can assess the agreement and circumstances, review proposed compensation and benefits, prepare termination or settlement documents, and advise on negotiations or a resulting dispute.
Reviewing one proposed dismissal involves different work from advising on a restructuring, an accommodation concern or an existing claim. We explain the proposed scope, fees and disbursements before you decide to retain us.
Our office is in Brampton. We assist employers in Toronto and across Peel, York, Halton and Durham, including Mississauga, Caledon, Vaughan, Markham, Richmond Hill, Oakville, Burlington, Milton, Pickering, Ajax, Whitby and Oshawa. Virtual appointments may be available for suitable matters elsewhere in Ontario, including Hamilton, Kitchener-Waterloo, London, Barrie and Ottawa.
Yes. A business that does not meet the statutory severance conditions may still have contractual or common-law obligations. Payroll size does not determine the entire assessment.
Not necessarily. The complete wording, enforceability and applicable minimum standards need review. A clause from an older template should not be assumed to remain suitable.
Short service does not answer every question. ESA eligibility, the agreement, earned compensation and protections against discrimination or reprisal must be considered separately.
Sometimes, for a legitimate reason wholly unrelated to the leave, but the governing leave, accommodation and other protections matter. The employee’s absence alone is not a sufficient basis for the decision.
No release should be treated as an automatic guarantee. Its terms, consideration, the claims involved and how it was obtained can affect enforceability.
We can assess whether we can assist with the documents, an employee’s demand or a dispute. Include what has already been sent or paid and any deadline in your initial summary.
If your business is considering a dismissal or has received an employment demand, contact our office about reviewing the agreement, obligations and available options. Tell us whether the decision has been communicated and when you need advice.
Request an employer consultation or call 905-283-8514.
Email: info@legalroute.ca
Office by appointment: 2074 Steeles Avenue East, Unit 17, Brampton, ON L6T 5A5
Hours: Monday–Friday, 9:30 a.m.–5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.
Contacting the firm does not create a lawyer-client relationship, extend a deadline or mean we have agreed to act. Representation requires a confirmed scope and fee arrangement.
This article provides general information about Ontario employment termination as of November 2026, not legal advice. The workplace, agreement, employment history, circumstances and applicable law determine the obligations and options in a particular matter.